|Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) in US Capitol complex|
Fox News Channel political contributor Julie Roginsky offered laurels to Lautenberg, to whom she was a senior political strategist, for the man who saved thousand of lives from drunk drivers and secondhand smoke as well as banning those convicted of domestic violence from exercising their Second Amendment rights. Prior to the Soviet Union's collapse, right center radio commentator Hugh Hewitt pointed out that Senator Lautenberg was instrumental at helping Soviet Jewry escape the Iron Curtain. Indubitably, Lautenberg was a quintessential modern liberal who approved of abortion and gun grabbing.
While I appreciate Julie Roginsky’s adoration for her old political boss, it seemed that almost all of his accomplishments and effective political presence occurred before he retired in 2000. Aside from acting as a leading voice against the George W. Bush Administration’s practice of engaging columnists like Armstrong Williams to publicize policies like “No Child Left Behind”, to this engaged political observer, Lautenberg’s legacy was being a reliable progressive vote. Senator Lautenberg 2.0's biggest accomplishment seemed to have been a “Campus Fire Safety Act” prompted by a fire at Seaton Hall fire, that was then attached to a Higher Education Reauthorization Act in 2008.
To me, Lautenberg’s legacy is a reminder of how Democrats have consistently tried to manipulate election law when it suits their purpose and insure election. Under New Jersey law, Democrats missed the deadline for replacing a candidate, saying a candidate who wants to get off the ballot must do so at least 51 days before the election, and a replacement must be selected at least 48 days before the vote. Toricelli dropped out 36 days before voters went to the polls and the then 78 year old Lautenberg was switched in 35 days before the election. No matter to the Democrat dominated New Jersey Supreme Court, which rationalized the substitution by invoking “the general intent” of election law, acting “for the public interest” to preserve a vigorous “two party system.” The problem is that none of that lexicon existed in the public statute.
So despite all of the good works that Lautenberg lovers may lionize during his first stint in the Senate, this political animal laments that Lautenberg’s legacy is being remembered as a political hack who was used to eviscerate election law. After being ushered into office again, the best that can be said about the later Lautenberg is that he was a reliable liberal vote. At worst, the electoral corruption stinks of the worst of New Jersey and is a reminder of how broken the American electoral process seems to be.
SEE MORE at DCBarroco.com