After the
attempted assassination of former Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ 8th),
there were calls for civility in political discourse. In the aftermath of the Tucson shooting,Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said:
Being more mindful of the weight of our words always helps. We have much more to gain than to lose from civility and discretion. …
Some may be inspired by the town halls of two Augusts ago. Others by the heated election debates. Some may be motivated by the conversation that started after Arizona. And many will seek more civility simply because it’s the right thing to do. Whatever the reason, I hope the turn to more responsible rhetoric is more than empty rhetoric. I intend to do my part.
But what
Democrats really meant by civility seems to be to silence their ideological
opponents with the cudgel of civility via the Lamestream Media without moderating their raucous
rhetoric or correcting their faux pas.
A recent
example of this incongruity between rhetoric and reality was Senator Reid's recent call for civil discourse on the Senate floor. The Senate Democrat Majority Leader had
called House Speaker John Boehner a coward for not standing up to anarchists in
his own party who Reid implied precipitated the Federal Government
shutdown. Reid also derided his
colleague Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) as the "very junior Senator from Texas" who was acting as the "Joint House
Speaker."
Yet Senator
Reid lectured the Senate about decorum:
We all have to understand that these rules create a little bit of distance so senators are more likely to debate ideas and less likely to talk about personalities. And if we do that, we maintain a more civil decorum as a result. So I bring this matter to the attention of senators because we've fallen out of this habit. It's gotten worse the last month or so.
To be fair, Senator Reid kind of apologized for his harsh words by intoning: "Some recent stories have even suggested that the speaker is keeping the
government shut down because I hurt his feelings. If that's true, I'm
sorry that I hurt your feelings."
So it's OK to capture headlines and slander your opponents, and then give a tentative mea culpa "if I hurt your feelings"? Where does someone go to get their reputation back?
So it's OK to capture headlines and slander your opponents, and then give a tentative mea culpa "if I hurt your feelings"? Where does someone go to get their reputation back?
Reid
advocated not mentioning other Senators by their first names and addressing
their colleagues in the third person.
This Senate Speak, a District of Calamity (sic) patois which Senator
John McCain (R-AZ) has mastered forces the speaker to call enemies "My
Friends" before rhetorically excoriating them. No wonder why so many ordinary people are turned off by politics.
Senator Cruz
has been the target of Democrats derision in the Federal Government Shutdown
fight. Cruz gave a short floor speech
which exposed this Sham of Senate Civility to conceal political perfidy.
There has
been a concerted effort in the Lamestream Media to discredit Ted Cruz as just
advancing his own presidential ambitions by prominently fighting for defunding
Obamacare. This scathing critique comes
from Democrats as well as Cocktail Party Republicans who understand the
earnestness of Tea Party conservatives who threaten their cushy
situations. Establishment Republicans
are content to go along to get along, cast symbolic votes which they can sell
to their primary voters but do not mean anything.
While Cruz
may leverage his prominence in the Shutdown fight for the 2016 Presidential
race, he is also living up to his role to represent constituents who are fed up
with the status quo and the meaningless games politicos in Washington play rather
than fight for their ideals. Civilly telling the truth is a rarity between the
beltways these days.
It
is beyond the pale of propriety to characterize Tea Party types like Senator
Cruz as anarchists for standing up for the Constitution. But the hostility towards such honest oratory from Tea Party politicians is revealing.
In the face of
totalitarian influences across the globe, George Orwell opined: "The further a society drifts away from
the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it." In a similar vein, the author of 1984 also wrote: "During times of
universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act."
Maybe Senator Reid's crie-de-coeur will be heard on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, where outrageous Obama incivility now seems to be an everyday occurrence
Maybe Senator Reid's crie-de-coeur will be heard on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, where outrageous Obama incivility now seems to be an everyday occurrence
No comments:
Post a Comment